N-term systems, Bennett’s fetish

N-term systems, Bennett’s fetish

Comment on Mechanization of Bennett….

Andrew said,
14.10.09 at 9:00 am ·
Bennett was quite clever in folding the laws of three and seven into his Systematics. They thus become particular examples of n-term systems, and he could justify use of them as three and seven term systems rather than as objective laws.

Your point is correct, but does that really change anything?
His n-term systems are in many cases dubious entities.

I might note that the 9-term system material, on the enneagram, is highly flawed, and puts the whole sheme at risk. The same could be said of dodecads.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s