Comments on Lozowick issue /2009/12/02/comments-on-lozowick-issue/

Comments on Lozowick issue

MBFM: Comment on Lozowick post

mybrainisafleamarket said,
02.12.0: 9 at 11:22 am ·
Here are some intriguing links. Make of it what you will. There appears to be some dispute as to whether Lozowick is indeeed recognized as being
a legitimate successor or mouthpiece for the dead guru Ramsuratkumar.

(Cough, cough)

(The links do not include a #2–I tried)

http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick1.html

http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick3.html

http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick4.html

However this notion that any publicity for a dead guru is good publicity sounds like yet more idiotic rationalization to me.

“All this is a game. All this is Bhagavan’s game, Bhagavan’s play. And these things were put here just to help people to get an ‘objective’ picture, to use their ‘buddhi’, their discrimination between truth and legend. As Krishna said, Lee was the perfect man for USA, for spreading Yogiji’s name there. And, even through books full of self-projection, Yogi Ramsuratkumar’s Name is spread. If people can come to Yogiji through Lee, it is perfect. Then, they will meet Truth, God, and forget all petty human legends. “