The question of evolution in our eonic model is based on world history which give us direct access to the visible (if any) process of the evolutionary. Source: Evolution to history: freedom evolving – Darwiniana
After so many confused books on Indian tradition it is almost a relief to read Danielou. However the old blog contains a lot of criticism of that writer who sadly was part of the Traditionalist school. But the point is to see the antiquity of Indic religion without injecting the OIT (Out of India Theory) … Continue reading Danielou and histories of Indian religious legacies
Life, evolution vs mind and cosmic energy /2010/02/08/life-evolution-vs-mind-and-cosmic-energy/ Bennett’s views are outlandish, no doubt, but he raises an issue that won’t go away: is mind evolution in man the same as life evolution in general? Bennett’s outrageous speculations nonetheless force the question. His system is divided into three levels, the mechanical, the life, and the cosmic … Continue reading Life, evolution vs mind and cosmic energy
Gurus as vampires, and the spiritual cannibalism racket /2009/12/07/gurus-as-vampires-and-the-spiritual-cannibalism-racket/ MBFM’s instincts are right. With Gold the issue of spiritual cannibalism comes to the fore and remains the joker in the deck behind the front he calls his teaching (he actually has no teaching, and reshuffles bullshit every few years into a new concoction). We are getting … Continue reading Gurus as vampires, and the spiritual cannibalism racket
Fourth ways and the great freedom sutra 6.6.3 A Sufi myth: Fourth Ways,…and The Great Freedom Sutra One of the more notable anti-modern occult conspiracies springs from the shadow Sufistic world, as documented by the reactionary mystic Ouspensky. The Islamic oikoumene generates the remarkable history of so-called Sufism, and this carries a confused legend of the … Continue reading Fourth ways and the great freedom sutra
/2009/03/02/gurdjieffouspensky-confusion-on-evolution/ One of the strains of the Gurdjieff corpus is the play of isolated remarks on evolution. Here we confront a tricky question. The issue of Darwinism is one thing, check out Darwiniana, the blog, for a series of critical views of Neo-Darwinism. A critique of Gurdjieff/Ouspensky on evolution is not intended as a plus … Continue reading Gurdjieff/Ouspensky confusion on evolution
https://www.dropbox.com/home/Public?preview=Archive_of+Gurdjieff_Con_selections_pdf.pdf Work in progress: archive of gurdjieff con, partially completed...the next version will have a table of contents for posts in the labryrinth of that blog...