Gurdjieff/Ouspensky confusion on evolution

/2009/03/02/gurdjieffouspensky-confusion-on-evolution/ One of the strains of the Gurdjieff corpus is the play of isolated remarks on evolution. Here we confront a tricky question. The issue of Darwinism is one thing, check out Darwiniana, the blog, for a series of critical views of Neo-Darwinism. A critique of Gurdjieff/Ouspensky on evolution is not intended as a plus … Continue reading Gurdjieff/Ouspensky confusion on evolution

Ages, new ages, axial ages, last and first men and an archive of The Gurdjieff Con

Introduction We have uploaded all the posts from the old Gurdjieff Con: it might be time to distill the gist with a selection, commentary, and a short book about the issues raised in a unique blog: as far as I know noone has ever stood up to occult gurus and lived to tell the tale. … Continue reading Ages, new ages, axial ages, last and first men and an archive of The Gurdjieff Con